17???

by


add to del.icio.us  Add to Blinkslist  add to furl  Digg it  add to ma.gnolia  Stumble It!  add to simpy  seed the vine  Reddit  Fark  TailRank

Trying to wrap my head around a story I just came across about”an Abbotsford family with 17 children — and another on the way.” 01

I understand that in ‘olden days’ it was not unusual for families to have lots of children. Sometimes, they even had the ability to feed them all. I seem to recall that Queen Anne had 17.

But in this day and age, is it really smart? Is it irresponsible?

Despite “be fruitful and multiply” entreaties by His Holiness, even Catholics don’t propogate like bunnies any more the way that we used to.

Strangely enough, another story in a different newspaper which says that Abbotsford has told Peace Lutheran Church “to stop feeding a group of homeless people [who are claimed to be] frightening residents of a seniors’ home” and that the city also claims that “the free food is also drawing in drug dealers and addicts [who are] congregating on the front steps” [of the aforementioned senior’s home]. 02

So, is it possible that it’s the addicts and drug dealers who are scaring the seniors?

In any event, if you’re going to sire 17 children, shouldn’t you guard against the possibility of being out of work by at least making sure that you’re living in a city that has a social safety net?

Sources:
01. 2008/05/16 – The Province: Back Chat
02. 2008/05/16 – Globe & Mail: City tells church to stop feeding the homeless

Advertisements

Tags: , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: