Posts Tagged ‘value’

Heritage Buildings: Their Value to You

August 15, 2008

In the past years the City of London has lost many of its most important and cherished heritage buildings. The famous Talbot Block (now recreated in the JLC), the recent loss of Locus Mount, the scare of loosing the Capital Theatre and the long list of other buildings that are deteriorating as we speak, The Normal School, the buildings of the London Psychiatric Hospital and now the Brunswick Hotel.

Recent news tells us that the owner of the Brunswick Hotel (better known as The Wick) is seeking a demolition permit due to the poor structural condition of the building, this is a permit that the city and local heritage activists will apparently not contest.

The Wick itself has been around in London since 1855 when its primary functions were of hotel and tavern. Today many of these activities continue at The Wick, however no where near at the same capacity as they once did.

Sometime within the past 15 years (the actual time period escapes me at the moment) The Wick has had its facade re-worked and cleaned up in an attempt to both restore the building to the respect it deserved, sadly the same attention has not been paid to the interior of the building and in recent years much of the inner structure has degraded and now a number of rooms in the hotel are un-inhabitable, one reason leading to the owner to apply for a demolition permit.

With that said it seems that London is loosing yet another of its Heritage buildings along with which will go the deep heritage that it carries with it.

Far too often people dismiss the importance of a heritage building and quickly call for it to be torn down, thinking that it holds no use in their lives or modern society. Although that may be true for a small percentage of the existing heritage building stock in the City of London the majority of the buildings carry a deep history with them that we can both taken in to enjoy and appreciate as well as learning from them at the same time.

If we simply disregard these buildings as old and useless we end up loosing the foundation for which this city and the society we live in were based upon. The stories of these buildings alone can only teach us (and future generations) a limited amount about our history, to the point that without the physical building history becomes something of simple the imagination with nothing substantial to tie the past to the present.

Although I may be considered an optimist and/or idealist I have in no way lost touch with reality. My academic and work background both have me immersed in heritage studies and I will be the first one to support a heritage building, however even I can see when a building has been lost (such as The Wick or the LPH Examination Building) and even I must accept its fate. The solution to this issues, the issue of loosing these buildings, is to not let a building get to such a poor condition in the first place.

We must begin to understand the actual importance of these buildings, the importance for today, and for tomorrow. We must invest in these buildings now so that those in the future can draw on the resources they provide. There are countless cities from around the Country World that invest in their built heritage and have gain significantly because of it, why cant London do the same? It is sad but it seems as each day when I read the paper I read of another building near extinction; this should not be the case.

Only by looking to the past can we properly plan for the future. If we look and nothing exists what does that say about the outlook for our future?

Timmie Rates a ‘Thumbs Down’

May 14, 2008

closed to community valuesIn this post about the Tim Horton’s employee who was fired for giving a Timbit to a baby, I questioned if the company truly cares about the communities in which it’s privileged to make it’s profits, or if everything it does is simply PR-motivated. And I referred to having had some personal experience in that regard.

Over on Dan Brown’s LFP blog (sorry, but you’ll have to search; they don’t provide permalinks) he suggests that “in the collective imagination, the typical Tim Hortons outlet has become the equivalent of a community centre. Their stores now serve the same purpose.” And he asks, “what do you think of my theory?”

Well, truth be told, he directed the question at another regular blogger. So, being as shy as I am about expressing my opinion, I agonized about answering it here. For about 1 second! 😉

I’ve got two different examples to share, which help to explain why I don’t think that the hugely successful coffee franchisor values the communities in which it does business.

The first example involves my experience as a local BookCrosser. I suggest that you read this media article to begin with. And then read the letter that I hand-delivered and never got a reply to.

The second example involves my experience as an active member of my local community association. Specifically, my repeated attempts to acquire permission to post notices of upcoming association meetings and community events in the two local TH franchises. Simply put, the reaction has always been the same… “It’s company policy that we aren’t allowed to put up notices.”

Bah, humbug. Go Scrooge yourselves! 😡

Added 2008/05/18:

Surprise! I received a telephone call on Friday from somebody at the TH head office. After she confirmed that it is company policy that franchises not post notices of community events, she tried to suggest that putting notices in the store windows would obstruct visibility and create an unsafe condition. When I countered that a simple notice could be allowed someplace else (eg. on a wall just inside the entrance) she simply repeated that the chain’s policy was to not allow any 3rd-party ads. Countering that spin, I pointed out that a community association cannot fairly be placed into the same category as a commercial advertiser and that assisting the promotion of a CA would be an excellent way for the chain to demonstrate it’s appreciation for the fact that it is privileged to be able to profit in our community. No dice. The spokesperson simply repeated the “it’s our company policy…” mantra and thanked me for my communication.

What do you think?

Added 2008/05/21:

self-promoThe Timmie’s spokesperson at it’s head office who telephoned me tried to suggest that allowing community-related notices to be posted on it’s premises would ‘junk up’ the environment, but witness what the chain is willing to do itself in order to solicit financial donations from it’s customers.
Kettle = Black?

What do you think?

Other Links:
2008/05/23 – NowPublic: Tiff at Tim Hortons

2008/05/28 – WinExtra: Make sure you count your Timmie change

What does the Tim Horton company value?

May 8, 2008

What does the Tim Horton company value? Besides corporate profit, and positive PR? Anything?

closed to community valuesAfter the local paper hit the stands this morning with the story of a Tim Horton employee who had been fired for giving a Timbit to a baby, I included a link to it in my daily index which I titled ‘Cold-hearted Tim Hortons PR blunder’ 01.

The story was picked up by CP and quickly went national 02. And international 03. And as I had anticipated, the reaction was not favourable for the most successful coffee franchisor in Canadian history.

The coffee chain’s head office did top-notch PR damage control after the story gained wide-spread exposure and “reinstated” the 27 y.o. single mother of four, throwing “an overzealous manager” into the jaws of public opinion in order to protect it’s corporate reputation. But can Tim Hortons head office be excused for what happened? Does Tim Hortons corporate head office actually have a positive outlook on such things as community values, or is it’s intervention simply a case of self-serving deception? Would Tim Hortons corporate head office intervened if the story had remained local? if the incident had been reported to them but not reported in the media at all?

Stay tuned for my follow-up post which will detail my own personal experience with Tim Hortons.

Sources:
01. 2008/05/08 – LFP: Timbit for baby costs job
02. 2008/05/08 – TorStar: Tim Hortons fires single mom…
03. 2008/05/08 – Digg: Woman fired at Tim Hortons…

Citizen Journalism

November 18, 2007

Despite the fact that newspaper circulation numbers are often inflated because of the practise of some publishers to bulk-sell their product, LFP Editor-in-Chief Paul Berton admits that “circulation at all newspapers is dropping by about 3 per cent a year” (‘Circulation‘; London Free Press; 2007/11/13).

Mr. Berton also candidly admits the inaccuracy of some newspaper content, and that sometimes it’s deliberate (‘I don’t believe a word of this‘; London Free Press; 2007/11/18).

All is not lost however.

Mr. Berton reminds us of the important role that the ‘citizen journalist’ can play in filling the void, and profers his opinion that they are “very valuable” (‘Can we trust citizen journalists?‘; London Free Press; 2007/11/18).

It’s nice to be appreciated.

add to del.icio.us  Add to Blinkslist  add to furl  Digg it  add to ma.gnolia  Stumble It!  add to simpy  seed the vine      TailRank